iron law of wages
Definition
- Noun (Economics):
- Theory of wage determination: The "iron law of wages" is a principle in classical economics, associated primarily with David Ricardo and later Thomas Malthus, which posits that wages tend to settle at the minimum level necessary for workers' subsistence. This law suggests that any increase in wages above this subsistence level will lead to population growth, which increases the labor supply, driving wages back down to subsistence.
Usage Examples
- (This refers to the economic theory that wages are forced down to subsistence level by population pressure.)
- (Here, the term is used to describe a controversial economic concept.)
Advanced Usage
- "The iron law of wages as a historical concept": The term is often discussed in the context of 19th-century economic thought, particularly in debates about capitalism and social reform.
- Marxists rejected the iron law of wages, calling it a tool to justify low pay. (The law was used to argue that higher wages were impossible without causing social collapse.)
Variants and Related Words
Wage (n): a fixed regular payment for work.
- The worker's wage was barely enough to cover his expenses. (A specific salary or hourly rate.)
Subsistence wage (n): a wage that only provides enough to cover basic necessities.
- Many laborers in the 1800s earned only a subsistence wage. (A wage at the level described by the iron law.)
Synonyms
- Subsistence theory of wages: another name for the same economic principle.
- Ricardo's law of wages: named after the economist David Ricardo.
Related Idioms
- Live from hand to mouth: to survive with only enough for immediate needs, similar to the subsistence level implied by the iron law.
- Under the iron law of wages, many workers lived from hand to mouth. (They had no savings or surplus.)
Related Concepts (Not a direct term, but contextually relevant)
- Malthusian trap: the idea that population growth prevents sustained economic growth, which underpins the iron law of wages.
- The iron law of wages is closely tied to the Malthusian trap, as both rely on population dynamics. (Both concepts suggest that population growth limits living standards.)